The Torah requires us to take great care to ensure the physical and even emotional well-being of animals.1 This is reflected in commandments such as helping an overloaded donkey and not muzzling an ox while it works.
The Torah teaches that every creature has inherent value and purpose, and we are forbidden to destroy or waste resources without reason. At the same time, the Torah permits2 humans to benefit from animals—for work, food, or clothing—reflecting a Divinely ordained hierarchy in creation: mineral, plant, animal, and human. Lower forms are spiritually elevated when used by higher ones in service of their Creator. Based on this principle, halachah distinguishes between cases in which causing pain to an animal is necessary and permitted, and those in which it is unnecessary and therefore forbidden.
What Type of Pain Is Prohibited?
The prohibition against causing an animal to suffer applies only to significant pain, not minor discomfort.
For example, if an animal falls into a pit on Shabbat, one may only violate the Rabbinic muktzeh prohibition to rescue the animal if it cannot be cared for while in the pit. If its needs can be met there, the discomfort of being in the pit alone is not enough to override even Rabbinic restrictions of Shabbat.3
Feeding Animals Before Eating
The verse, “And I will give grass in your field for your cattle, and then you will eat and be satisfied,”4 teaches that one should feed one’s animals before eating.5 This applies to any animal—bird, fish, or otherwise—in one’s care, but not to stray or ownerless animals.6 It also extends to fast days and even to interrupting a blessing (before eating) to instruct someone to feed the animals.7 Drinking, however, is generally permitted beforehand, as illustrated in the stories of Eliezer and Rebecca8 and of Moses and the Jewish people in the desert.910
On Shabbat and festivals, we are permitted—and obligated—to feed animals dependent on us, but may not feed animals that aren’t reliant on our care.
Neutering or Spaying Animals
One is prohibited from spaying or neutering an animal. While some associate this with tzaar baalei chayim, technically it is a separate prohibition (at least for male animals). Thus, even if it didn’t cause the animal pain, it would still be prohibited.11 One is, however, permitted to purchase an animal that has already been neutered by a non-Jew.12
Hunting and Needless Killing
Although Judaism permits killing animals when necessary—for food, clothing, medical research, or livelihood—it strictly prohibits causing unnecessary pain.13
In all of Scripture, only two people are described as hunters: Nimrod and Esau—figures portrayed negatively in Jewish tradition. Nimrod is called “a mighty hunter before the L‑rd,”14 and Esau is described as “a man who understood hunting, a man of the field,”15 (in contrast to his brother Jacob, who is described as “dwelling in tents”—symbolizing study and refinement). This alone reflects the Torah’s disapproval of hunting as a pastime.16
While kosher slaughter (shechitah) is allowed because it is done swiftly and humanely, hunting for sport often causes prolonged suffering and death, violating both the letter and the spirit of the law. Even if the kill is quick, in which case it would not be a violation of tzaar baalei chayim, many rabbis still oppose hunting for sport because it fosters cruelty.17
Judaism values conservation and the belief that every creation has a Divine purpose. Killing animals without need—not for sustenance, not for clothing, not for legitimate use—is seen as depriving them of fulfilling their G‑d-given role in creation. The Lubavitcher Rebbe also denounced the cruelty of hunting, recounting how his predecessor was rebuked as a child for simply tearing a leaf from a tree unnecessarily, highlighting that even thoughtlessly harming plant life is improper, and all the more so when it comes to animals.18
Fishing for Sport
While fishing is often viewed as a peaceful pastime, halachically, there is a debate whether tzaar baalei chayim applies. Some authorities argue that the prohibition doesn't apply to fish, noting that removing scales from live fish is permitted, unlike plucking feathers from a live goose.19 Others disagree, pointing out that fish caught and released often suffer injuries that lead to death, making recreational catch-and-release fishing problematic.20 Fishing for food or therapeutic purposes is permitted, though it’s best to keep and use the fish rather than return it to the water, in deference to the opinion that tzaar baalei chayim does apply to fish.
Using Animals for Medical Experiments
As mentioned earlier, causing an animal pain is permitted when it serves a beneficial purpose, such as healing or other human needs. However, Rabbi Moshe Isserlis (the Rama), in the Code of Jewish Law, adds that even when technically allowed, one should still, as an act of piety, avoid causing unnecessary pain, since cruelty can negatively affect a person’s character traits.21
Some, therefore, argue that although animal testing for medical or scientific purposes may be halachically permitted, it should be avoided to prevent fostering cruelty.22
Others strongly disagree with this approach. They maintain that one may not be extra stringent when the lives of others are at stake. Prioritizing animal welfare over human life is misplaced morality.23 Thus, even according to Rabbi Isserlis, it is fully permitted to experiment on animals for human benefit.
While this reasoning applies to medical research, when it comes to using animals for other types of studies or testing, one must be mindful of the warning against cruelty and should consult a rabbi with any specific questions.
Killing Insects and Small Creatures
Jewish law permits killing insects or animals that are a nuisance, such as pests in the home or creatures that threaten health, food, or safety. This includes mosquitoes, flies, lice, mice, ants, and spiders—especially when they bite, spread disease, or infest food. The principle is that tzaar baalei chayim does not apply when the act serves a human need. Thus, exterminating bugs or rodents for health, cleanliness, or peace of mind is halachically permitted.24 Dangerous creatures that may cause injury, like snakes, must be killed to prevent future harm. Still, one should avoid causing unnecessary pain—if the same result can be achieved with less suffering (e.g., using poison or traps), it is preferred. Additionally, one should use indirect methods in order to avoid cultivating cruel character traits.25
Going Beyond the Letter of the Law
That said, many great sages chose to avoid directly killing even nuisance insects. Both the Arizal26 and Rabbi Sholom Dovber of Lubavitch,27 for instance, would brush away mosquitoes rather than kill them, reflecting a refined spiritual awareness of the Divine purpose in all life. While this exemplary conduct is not required, it is praiseworthy for those who can adopt it. Still, if indirect killing would cause greater suffering, some authorities rule that killing directly may be preferable.

There was no animal cruelty in the Garden of Eden and this is what we need to strive to return to
Did God state to Adam and Eve, that everything in the Garden of Eden was food for them except the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge? Their sons, Cain and Abel brought both grain and animal sarifices to God as a Torah edict. Do you think that they did not slaughter their herd animals as tasty food for their folks and themselves?
"Nature is red in blood and claw." In other words many animals are carnivorous and there is no reason to believe that this situation did not exist when Adam and Eve lived in Gan Edan.
Isaiah suggests that the situation will change and with the arrival of the Messiah, the lion will lay down with the lamb, etc., but our better understanding of how wild animals find live food suggests that this would be impossible, unless some artificial meat supply had already been generated (which has recently been achieved at a small-scale, using animal proteins) and was being freely available for many kinds of animals and humans too.
So Andrew, are you claiming that this new technology would be so extremely widely spread? Or perhaps Isaiah was illustrating by an unrealistic but idealistic situation, how greater peace would spread, including that of the animals?
Before Adam and Eve fell into sin, there was no cruelty or violence.
Adam and Eve were given all the fruits of the garden to eat, except that of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
You are right Arnie, Cain and Abel brought grain and animal sacrifices but Cain and Abel were born after Adam and Eve were banished from the Garden of Eden.
Paradise is an ideal state but a state we need to strive to return to.
Compassion to all of Gad's creatures is key to this.
Genesis 1:29 says "And God said, "Behold, I have given you every seed bearing herb, which is upon the surface of the entire earth, and every tree that has seed bearing fruit; it will be yours for food." This is referring only vegetation. They had no permission until Noah to slaughter animals for food.
Apparently God forbid only one thing to eat in the Garden of Eden. They were given one commandment forbidding them from eating from the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge. There is no evident Torah commandment not to eat meat while they lived in the Garden.
Genesis 1:28-29, God gives permission to eat from all living things. "God blessed them and God said to them,
“Be fertile and increase, fill the earth and master it; and rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, and all the living things that creep on earth.” God said, “See, I give you every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit; they shall be yours for food."
All living things- they shall be yours food.